Demonstrating knowledge value: a broader perspective on metrics
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Intellectual Capital
- Vol. 5 (1) , 77-91
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410512932
Abstract
This paper focuses on current efforts to demonstrate the value of knowledge in organisations with reference to activities and systems for the measurement of intangibles. These efforts stem largely from widespread dissatisfaction with the manner in which traditional accounting methods treat intangibles. The wider context is that of national and international governments and organisations striving to master the drivers of knowledge‐based change by involvement in research projects, in conferences, in attempts to find new means of representing intangibles in standard industrial classifications and national accounts and in standards setting for knowledge management. Organisationally this is manifest in proprietary systems for measuring intangibles, many of which suffer the handicap of being overly‐focused on single organisations, with the metrics process continuing to lack critical mass. Although such efforts are necessary and will continue, they are most likely to succeed where they relate to mainstream business activities and operate not so much as metrics as indicators.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capitalInternational Journal of Management Reviews, 2001
- Hanslick, EduardPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2001
- Intellectual capital: current issues and policy implicationsJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2000
- Intellectual capital literature reviewJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2000
- Developing knowledge management metrics for measuring intellectual capitalJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2000
- The value evolutionJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2000
- Intellectual Capital Statements and Knowledge Management: ‘Measuring’, ‘Reporting’, ‘Acting’Australian Accounting Review, 1999