Test Stakes and Item Format Interactions
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Measurement in Education
- Vol. 13 (1) , 55-77
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1301_3
Abstract
The effects of test consequences, response formats (multiple choice or constructed response), gender, and ethnicity were studied for the math and science sections of a high school diploma endorsement test. There was an interaction between response format and test consequences: Under both response formats, students performed better under high stakes (diploma endorsement) than under low stakes (pilot test), but the difference was larger for the constructed response items. Gender and ethnicity did not interact with test stakes; the means of all groups increased when the test had high stakes. Gender interacted with format; boys scored higher than girls on multiple-choice items, girls scored higher than boys on constructed-response items.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validating Inferences From National Assessment of Educational Progress Achievement-Level ReportingApplied Measurement in Education, 1998
- Unintended Consequences of Perfiormance Assessment: Issues of Bias and FairnessEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1995
- Equity Issues In Performance-Based AssessmentPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- The Effect of Expectations on Achieving Equity in State-Wide Testing: Lessons From MassachusettsPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance AssessmentsEducational Researcher, 1994
- Motivational Effects on Test Scores of Elementary StudentsThe Journal of Educational Research, 1993
- Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation CriteriaEducational Researcher, 1991
- MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKINGPersonnel Psychology, 1990
- Race, Instruction, and LearningAmerican Sociological Review, 1986
- MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND BAYESIAN PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN ITEM RESPONSE THEORYJournal of Educational Measurement, 1986