Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientometrics
- Vol. 11 (5-6) , 333-350
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02279353
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Study of the Formal LevelSocial Studies of Science, 1986
- A re-examination of the Ortega hypothesis: The Dutch caseScientometrics, 1986
- A comparative study of bibliometric past performance analysis and peer judgementScientometrics, 1985
- The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performanceResearch Policy, 1985
- Evaluating big science: CERN's past performance and future prospectsScientometrics, 1985
- Evaluating research output through life work citation countsScientometrics, 1985
- Peer Review and the Support of ScienceScientific American, 1977
- The Matthew Effect in ScienceScience, 1968