An Experimental Comparison of Four Hearing Aid Prescription Methods
- 1 February 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 9 (1) , 22-32
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198802000-00013
Abstract
Four hearing aid prescription methods were compared. A digital master hearing aid was used to produce the prescribed frequency gain characteristics. Measures of speech recognition and paired comparison judgments of relative speech intelligibility and speech quality were obtained at three output levels for each of the experimental frequency gain characteristics. No single prescriptive method emerged as being clearly superior. Relative performance of the four prescriptive methods varied as a function of output level. Similar results were observed for both speech recognition testing and paired comparison testing.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paired comparison judgments of relative intelligibility in noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982
- Some effects of spectral shaping on recognition of speech by hearing-impaired listenersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982
- Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: Effects of high-frequency compensationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980
- Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: Where is the ’’missing 6 dB’’?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978