General Management and Medical Autonomy in the National Health Service
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Health Services Management Research
- Vol. 2 (1) , 38-46
- https://doi.org/10.1177/095148488900200105
Abstract
Clinical freedom is an elastic concept and its practical meaning to clinicians varies with time and context. Management pressure on clinical freedom is also likely to be elastic. Resource constraints are increasing pressure on clinical freedom. The paper reviews the nature of such pressure and considers the extent to which general managers have successfully eroded medical autonomy. Drawing on emerging evidence from research in progress on the impact of general management, the paper concludes that there is little sign of change in doctor-manager relations. They continue to inhabit a shared culture of medical autonomy in which only rarely do managers challenge clinicians.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE RELUCTANT MANAGERS: CLINICIANS AND BUDGETS IN THE NHSFinancial Accountability & Management, 1988
- Managing the National Health ServicePublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- Physician autonomy in the Federal Republic of Germany, Great Britain and The United StatesThe International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 1986
- Central accountability and local decision making: towards a new NHS.BMJ, 1985
- Theories of Organizational CultureOrganization Studies, 1984
- The Impact of Organizational Culture on Approaches to Organizational Problem-SolvingOrganization Studies, 1984
- PLANS AND PRACTICE: THE PARTICIPANTS' VIEWSPublic Administration, 1983
- Policy-making in the National Health ServicePublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- Professional/Bureaucratic Conflict: The Case of the Medical Profession in the National Health ServiceSociological Review, 1975