Imitation explains the propagation, not the stability of animal culture
Open Access
- 4 November 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 277 (1681) , 651-659
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1615
Abstract
For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its stability. We review the literature on transmission chain studies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other animals, and we use a formal model to argue that imitation, which may well play a major role in the propagation of animal culture, cannot be considered faithful enough to explain its stability. We consider the contribution that other psychological and ecological factors might make to the stability of animal culture observed in the wild.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social diffusion of novel foraging methods in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- Critical points in current theory of conformist social learningJournal of Evolutionary Psychology, 2007
- Copying without rewards: socially influenced foraging decisions among brown capuchin monkeysAnimal Cognition, 2007
- Spread of arbitrary conventions among chimpanzees: a controlled experimentProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Understanding culture across speciesTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004
- Inhibition of optimal behavior by social transmission in the guppy depends on shoalingBehavioral Ecology, 2002
- Interactions between shoal size and conformity in guppy social foragingAnimal Behaviour, 2001
- On the relation between social dynamics and social learningAnimal Behaviour, 1995
- The question of animal cultureHuman Nature, 1992
- Cultural Transmission of Enemy Recognition: One Function of MobbingScience, 1978