Arguments for Abandoning the Term Pseudodementia
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 30 (10) , 665-668
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1982.tb05067.x
Abstract
The term pseudodementia should be avoided in clinical practice. Its importance lies in the fact that it has alerted clinicians to the existence of potentially reversible, or at least treatable, cases of intellectual dysfunction. However, two major problems are associated with its use. First, it implies that the patient has either an organic or a functional illness, whereas many patients have elements of both, especially when depression is superimposed on a true dementia. Second, the term is often mistakenly used diagnostically, whereas it is only descriptive. The term cognitive impairment is preferable to pseudodementia.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coexistence of cognitive impairment and depression in geriatric outpatientsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1982
- Treatment Results at a Multi‐Specialty Clinic for the Impaired Elderly and Their Families*Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1981
- PseudodementiaArchives of General Psychiatry, 1981
- A clinic for the impaired elderly and their familiesAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1980
- Senility ReconsideredPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1980
- Dr. Wells RepliesAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1980
- PseudodementiaAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1979
- The myth of pseudodementia: depression and the aging brainAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1978
- PSEUDO‐DEMENTIAActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1961