Effects of Various Anesthetic Agents on Laryngeal Motion During Laryngoscopy in Normal Dogs
- 24 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Veterinary Surgery
- Vol. 33 (2) , 102-106
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2004.04016.x
Abstract
Objective—To evaluate the effects of various drugs and drug combinations conventionally used for anesthesia on arytenoid cartilage motion during laryngoscopy in normal dogs.Study Design—Experimental study.Animals—Six large breed healthy dogs with no previous history of respiratory dysfunction.Methods—Each dog was randomly assigned to a different injectable anesthetic protocol once weekly for 6 weeks, then in the 7th week all dogs were anesthetized with isoflurane. Videolaryngoscopy was performed and recorded starting immediately after induction until dogs could no longer be safely restrained for endoscopy. Video was digitized and 3 still images ofmaximalinspiration and expiration from the first 15 seconds (induction) and the last 15 seconds (recovery) were captured and imported into an image analysis software program. The height andarea of the laryngeal ostium were measured in pixels. Normalization of the glottal gap areawasperformed using the formula (normalized glottal gap area (NGGA)=area in pixels/height2). ANOVA was performed on the NGGA of images collected at inspiration and expiration during induction and recovery. Fischer's exact test was performed when significance (P<.05) wasfound.Results—Within each protocol, laryngeal motion (defined as change in NGGA) at induction was not significantly different from laryngeal motion measured at recovery. Additionally, no significant differences were found in arytenoid motion immediately after induction when anesthetic protocols were compared. Arytenoid motion before recovery was significantly greater with thiopental when compared with propofol (P=.046), ketamine+diazepam (P=.0098), acepromazine+thiopental (P=.0021), and acepromazine+propofol (P=.0065). No significant difference in arytenoid motion was seen immediately after induction or before recovery when acepromazine+butorphanol+ isoflurane and thiopental were compared.Conclusion—We concluded that intravenous thiopental given to effect is the best choice for assessing laryngeal function in dogs. Dogs premedicated with acepromazine with or without opioids that require further anesthetic restraint for laryngoscopy should be anesthetized with isoflurane administered by mask.Clinical Relevance—Misdiagnosis of laryngeal paralysis during laryngoscopy can be avoided by selecting the anesthetic regimens with the least effect on arytenoid motion.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Newer diagnostic and surgical techniques and their impact on anesthesia.Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 1999
- Propofol AnesthesiaVeterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 1999
- Influence of Size and Etiology of Glottal Gap in Glottic Incompetence DysphoniaThe Laryngoscope, 1998
- A review of laryngeal paralysis in dogsBritish Veterinary Journal, 1995
- Diagnosis and Management of Laryngeal Disease in the Dog and CatVeterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 1994
- Laryngeal paralysis in dogs: An evaluation of the bilateral arytenoid lateralisation procedureJournal of Small Animal Practice, 1993
- Diseases of the LarynxVeterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 1992
- Complications and Long‐term Results after Partial Laryngectomy for the Treatment of Idiopathic Laryngeal Paralysis in 45 DogsVeterinary Surgery, 1991
- Potency of rapidly acting barbiturates in dogs, using inhibition of the laryngeal reflex as the end pointAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 1990
- The assessment of corrective surgery for canine laryngeal paralysis by blood gas analysis: a review of thirty‐five casesJournal of Small Animal Practice, 1987