Effect of Meeting Leapfrog Volume Thresholds on Complication Rates Following Complex Surgical Procedures
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 251 (2) , 377-383
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181cb853f
Abstract
There is limited published data on the relationship between hospital volume and postoperative complications. The objectives of the current study are to examine the association between hospital volume and complications and also to examine the association between complications and in-hospital mortality following 5 complex surgical procedures. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample for years 2000 to 2003 was used. Patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA), pancreatectomy (PAN), and esophagectomy (ESO) as primary procedures were selected. Hospital volumes were calculated as suggested by the Leapfrog Group evidence-based hospital referral criteria. The association between hospital volume and complications were examined by multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. A total of 261551 CABG, 573072 PCI, 35104 AAA, 4931 PAN, and 2473 ESO procedures were selected for analysis. A total of 580 hospitals performed the CABG procedures during the study period in this dataset. The corresponding numbers of hospitals for PCI, AAA, PAN, and ESO were 714, 1207, 758, and 555 respectively. In-hospital complication rates following CABG, PCI, AAA, PAN, and ESO were 26.45%, 6.74%, 23.81%, 39.28%, and 46.30%, respectively. High-volume hospitals for all the procedures were associated with lower odds for in-hospital mortality when compared with low-volume hospitals (P < 0.05). High-volume hospitals were associated with significantly lower odds for at least one complication following 3 of the 5 procedures (PCI, AAA, and PAN) and specifically for significantly lower odds for respiratory complications following CABG, AAA, and PAN, digestive complications following PAN, hemorrhage/hematoma complications following PCI, and septicemia following PCI and PAN when compared with low-volume hospitals (P < 0.05). Lower mortality rates in high-volume hospitals can be partly, though not completely, attributed to lower complication rates. Future studies must focus on identifying other potential pathways for reduced mortality in high-volume hospitals.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Nephrectomy at Select Medical Centers—A Case of Follow the Crowd?Journal of Urology, 2006
- IMPACT OF HOSPITAL AND SURGEON VOLUME ON IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY FROM RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: DATA FROM THE HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION PROJECTJournal of Urology, 2005
- What Would Be the Effect of Referral to High‐Volume Hospitals in a Largely Rural State?The Journal of Rural Health, 2004
- ASSOCIATION BETWEEN VOLUME AND CHARGES FOR MOST FREQUENTLY PERFORMED AMBULATORY AND NONAMBULATORY SURGERY FOR BLADDER CANCER. IS MORE CHEAPER?Journal of Urology, 2004
- Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measuresSurgery, 2004
- The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to LeapfrogThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2003
- Surgical volume and quality of care for esophageal resection: do high-volume hospitals have fewer complications?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2003
- Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the LiteratureAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiativeSurgery, 2001