Abdominal plain film in patients admitted with clinical suspicion of renal colic: Should it be replaced by low-dose computed tomography?
- 31 January 2006
- Vol. 67 (1) , 64-68
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.042
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute Renal Colic from Ureteral CalculusNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Urinary Tract Stones—Part I: Role of Radiological Imaging in Diagnosis and Treatment PlanningClinical Radiology, 2003
- Nonenhanced Helical CT and US in the Emergency Evaluation of Patients with Renal Colic: Prospective ComparisonRadiology, 2000
- PLAIN ABDOMINAL X-RAY VERSUS COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY SCREENING: SENSITIVITY FOR STONE LOCALIZATION AFTER NONENHANCED SPIRAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHYJournal of Urology, 2000
- Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1999
- THE VALUE OF UNENHANCED HELICAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE FLANK PAINJournal of Urology, 1998
- Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT.Radiology, 1997
- The use of standard imaging techniques and their diagnostic value in the workup of renal colic in the setting of intractable flank painUrology, 1996
- Ultrasonography and Plain Film Versus Intravenous urography in ureteric colicClinical Radiology, 1993
- Ultrasonic diagnosis of ureteral calculi in patients with acute flank painEuropean Journal of Radiology, 1990