TEXTURAL DIFFERENTIATION ON THE SHORE FACE DURING EROSIONAL RETREAT OF AN UNCONSOLIDATED COAST, CAPE HENRY TO CAPE HATTERAS, WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC SHELF
- 14 June 1971
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Sedimentology
- Vol. 16 (3-4) , 221-250
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1971.tb00229.x
Abstract
In order to evaluate a model of Holocene shelf sediment distribution requiring a nearshore modern sand facies and an offshore relict sand facies, we have undertaken a textural reconnaissance of the Virginia‐North Carolina Coast between Capes Henry and Hatteras. Grab samples were subjected to grain‐size analysis by means of a modified Woods Hole Rapid Sediment Analyser. Textural provinces were erected with the aid of factor vector analysis. These include medium‐grained sands of the beach and surf zones; seaward fining, fine‐grained sands of the shore face, and heterogenous sands of the sea floor. In this latter province, grain size is controlled by a ridge and swale topography, with coarser sand on the crests. Coast‐wise grain‐size trends on the beach and shore face can be explained by assuming that wave heights increase toward the south, and that the Pleistocene sediment source is exposed higher on the shore face in the north than it is in the south. The shore face is retrograding, except in the vicinity of Diamond Shoals. There is textural evidence for a former Albemarle River channel, which bisects the study area. A model for sediment fractionation on a retreating barrier coast with low sediment input is proposed, based on studies which indicate that on such coasts: (1) barrier superstructures retreat more or less continuously by upper shore‐face erosion and storm washover; and (2) lower shore‐face erosion results in an equal‐volume aggradation of the adjacent sea floor, and forms the leading edge of the Holocene transgressive sand sheet. The nearshore “modern” sands and offshore “relict” sands are both present in the study area, but the terms are unnecessarily restrictive. Both are “relict” in the sense of being derived from a Pleistocene substrate, and both are “modern” in the sense of having undergone adjustment to a modern hydraulic regime. While modern and relict are useful general terms, it is convenient in this area to refer to a Holocene barrier sand prism, versus a Holocene transgressive sand sheet.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relict Sediments on Continental Shelves: A ReconsiderationThe Journal of Geology, 1971
- Submergence Effects on a Rhode Island Barrier and Lagoon and Inferences on Migration of BarriersThe Journal of Geology, 1970
- The Scale of Shore ErosionThe Journal of Geology, 1968
- Control of Grain Dispersion by Particle Size and Wave StateThe Journal of Geology, 1967
- The Bruun Theory of Sea-Level Rise as a Cause of Shore ErosionThe Journal of Geology, 1967
- The Use of Factor Analysis in Determining Depositional Environments from Grain-Size DistributionsJournal of Sedimentary Research, 1966
- Laboratory Study of Sea-Level Rise as a Cause of Shore ErosionThe Journal of Geology, 1965
- Pleistocene Sea Levels, Southeastern VirginiaScience, 1963
- A New Roundness Scale for Sedimentary ParticlesJournal of Sedimentary Research, 1953
- CONTINENTAL SHELF SEDIMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAGSA Bulletin, 1952