Aortoiliac and femoropopliteal phase-based NMR angiography: A comparison between FLAG and RSE
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 15 (3) , 372-385
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910150304
Abstract
To assess the performance of FLAG and RSE NMR angiography 22 aortoiliac (A1) and 22 femoropopliteal (FP) angiograms in 11 healthy males, mean age 38 ± 7.6 years, were acquired. The image quality was graded in a blinded fashion by two independent readers. The readers grades were not statistically different (K = 0.5696). The representation of diagnostic images was 6/ 11 FLAG and 8/ 11 RSE A1 as well as 8/ 11 FLAG and 8/ 11 RSE FP. On back‐to‐back comparison six RSE A1 and seven RSE FP were graded bettcr than their FLAG counterparts. Although these differences did not achieve a statistical significance RSE NMR angiography provided consistently better images and appears preferable for imaging of the peripheral vascular system in normal subjects. © 1990 Academic Press, Inc.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Three‐dimensional phase contrast angiographyMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1989
- Time‐resolved magnetic resonance angiographyMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1988
- Rapid scan magnetic resonance angiographyMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1987
- MR angiography by selective inversion recoveryMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1987
- Magnetic resonance angiography.Radiology, 1986
- Projection angiograms of blood labeled by adiabatic fast passageMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1986
- Projective Imaging of Pulsatile Flow with Magnetic ResonanceScience, 1985
- Selective Projection Imaging: Applications to Radiography and NMRIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1982
- Nuclear magnetic resonance whole-body imager operating at 3.5 KGauss.Radiology, 1982
- Changes in diastolic time with various pharmacologic agents: implication for myocardial perfusion.Circulation, 1979