Why not LF for false belief reasoning?
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 25 (6) , 682-683
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x02310124
Abstract
We argue that natural language has the right degree of representational richness for false belief reasoning, especially the complements under verbs of communication and belief. Language may indeed be necessary synchronically for cross-modular reasoning, but certain achievements in language seem necessary at least diachronically for explicit reasoning about false beliefs.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: