Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements.
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- Vol. 45 (399) , 548-52
Abstract
The introduction of quality assurance and medical audit has been an important development in general practice. However, the introduction of such programmes does not necessarily mean they are implemented by general practitioners. A study was undertaken to describe the problems and requirements perceived by general practitioners in relation to the implementation of quality assurance and medical audit in general practice. Interviews were carried out with a stratified sample of 120 Dutch general practitioners. Knowledge, acceptance and application of quality assurance and medical audit activities were investigated, and perceived problems and requirements in implementing quality assurance and audit activities were explored. General practitioners in the Netherlands were generally positive towards quality assurance activities, but had little experience of carrying out such activities. The most frequently mentioned obstacles to implementing quality assurance activities concerned lack of time, colleagues' negative attitudes and fear of assessment and criticism by colleagues. Requirements for implementing quality assurance included having regular meetings with colleagues about quality assurance, having information on the aims and methods of quality assurance, having data from other practices with which to compare performance, having support in data collection, in audit in the practice and in setting up local peer review, and having financial support. The most important factor predicting the actual application of quality assurance activities was found to be knowledge of specific quality assurance activities. Well-designed programmes for the implementation of quality assurance and medical audit, using a variety of different interventions, have to be developed. Such programmes should include the training of professionals in the concepts and methods of quality assurance as well as the provision of financial support for quality assurance activities.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality improvement by peer review in primary care: a practical guide.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1994
- Single and Combined Strategies for Implementing Changes in Primary Care: A Literature ReviewInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1994
- Audit: teaching medical students in general practiceMedical Education, 1993
- Obstacles to medical audit: British doctors speakSocial Science & Medicine, 1993
- Educational potential of medical audit: observations from a study of small groups setting standards.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- Implementing guidelines in general practice care.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- Survey of general practice audit in Leeds.BMJ, 1991
- National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards.1990
- PEER REVIEW IN PRIMARY CAREInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1990
- Are general practitioners in favour of quality assurance?1989