A Possession of One's Own: Women and Consumer Behavior in England, 1660–1740
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of British Studies
- Vol. 25 (2) , 131-156
- https://doi.org/10.1086/385858
Abstract
Hall Men are born free, how is it that all Women are born slaves? As they must be if the being subjected to the inconstant, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary Will of Men, be the Perfect Condition of Slavery? [Mary Astell, Reflections upon Marriage (London, 1700), p. 66]The wife ought to be subject to the husband in all things. [Hannah Woolley, The Gentlewoman's Companion or a GUIDE to the Female sex (London, 1675), p. 104]IDid men and women have different cultural and material values in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries? We know very little in detail about the activities of people within their homes and especially about their attitudes to the material goods that they used and that surrounded them. Virginia Woolf's complaint that she had no model to “turn about this way and that” in exploring the role of women in fiction applies equally to women's behavior as consumers, for we still do not know, as she put it, “what, in short, they did from eight in the morning till eight at night.” Did their particular roles within the household result in different material values, just as their biological and economic roles were different? We do know that power was unequally distributed within the household, although we can also demonstrate cooperation and affection between family members. We take it that the household was, in some sense, the woman's domain, but very often we cannot explore what this meant in practice. In short, was being “subjected to the inconstant, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary Will of Men” reflected in women's cultural values and tastes?These are broad questions that are not easily answered, either in theory or by observation, especially as it is not easy to identify the behavior of women as distinct from that of the family and household, but they are questions worth asking to see if there are signs of behavior different enough to warrant the view that there was a subculture in which women had the chance to express themselves and their views of the world separately, especially as the daily routines of their lives were different.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Love and Power in the Peasant Family: Rural France in the Nineteenth CenturyJournal of Interdisciplinary History, 1984
- Literacy and society in the west, 1500–1850∗Social History, 1983
- Modern Material Culture: The Archaeology of Us. Richard A. Gould and Michael B. Schiffer, editors. Academic Press, New York, 1981. xvii + 347 pp., illus., biblio., index. $34.00 (cloth).American Antiquity, 1983
- Small Books and Pleasant Histories: Popular Fiction and Its Readership in Seventeenth-Century England.The Economic History Review, 1982
- Estimating Wealth of the Living from a Probate SampleJournal of Interdisciplinary History, 1982
- An Algorithm for Probate SamplingJournal of Interdisciplinary History, 1981
- Household and Kinship: Ryton in the late 16th and early 17th centuriesHistory Workshop Journal, 1980
- The pro to‐industrial family economy: The structural function of household and family during the transition from peasant society to industrial capitalism1Social History, 1976
- Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honor of J. H. PlumbThe American Historical Review, 1976
- The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.American Sociological Review, 1956