Classification of resistant hypertension.
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hypertension
- Vol. 11 (3_pt_2) , II67-70
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.11.3_pt_2.ii67
Abstract
Resistant hypertension has become a less frequently encountered clinical problem. It may be defined as failure to control pressure below levels of 160/100 mm Hg despite adequate nonpharmacological intervention and pharmacotherapy. Adequate therapy is defined as the use of three antihypertensive agents, which includes a diuretic plus two other compounds. Resistant hypertension may be classified as physician resistant, patient resistant, and hypertension resistant. Each of these categories is described, and resolution of the problem of resistance can usually be achieved by improved patient education and adherence to therapy, reevaluation of diagnosis, and consideration of alternative therapeutic programs.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonpharmacological approaches to the control of high blood pressure. Final report of the Subcommittee on Nonpharmacological Therapy of the 1984 Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.Hypertension, 1986
- Osler's Maneuver and PseudohypertensionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1984
- The problem of obesity and hypertension.Hypertension, 1983
- Achievements in hypertension: A 25 year overviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- High Blood PressureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1979
- Resistant Hypertension: Diagnosis and ManagementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1978
- Effect of Weight Loss without Salt Restriction on the Reduction of Blood Pressure in Overweight Hypertensive PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Dependence of Arterial Pressure on Intravascular Volume in Treated Hypertensive PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1972