What is ideal genetic counselling? A survey of current international guidelines
- 16 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 16 (4) , 445-452
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201983
Abstract
The objective of this article is to review guidelines that address counselling in the context of genetic testing in order to summarise what aspects of counselling they consider most important, and to examine how they construct the ideal of genetic counselling. Guidelines were collected by examining the websites of different international professional, political, ethical and patient organisations, either previously known or found with the help of the Google search engine, and also using references listed in other studies. The most frequently mentioned topics in the collected 56 guidelines were sought, and this was carried out with the software package Qualitative Solutions and Research for Non-numerical Unstructured Data Indexing Searching and Theorizing. Topics related to genetic counselling that were mentioned in at least 30 of 56 collected documents were considered to be the most important aspects of genetic counselling. The ideal of genetic counselling is expressed in the analysed guidelines as being composed of (1) an appropriately trained professional who understands genetics and its ethical implications well; (2) relevant and objective information; (3) assurance of the counsellee's understanding; (4) psychological support; (5) informed consent; (6) confidentiality of genetic information; (7) considering familial implications; (8) appropriate handling of potential discrimination of testing; and (9) assuring autonomous decision-making by the counsellee. The ideal of genetic counselling is rather consistent in the guidelines, but there are some contradictions between the requirements of objective information-giving and adapting counselling to counsellee's circumstances.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients’ feelings about ward nursing regimes and involvement in rule constructionJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2006
- Cascade Screening: Whose information is it anyway?European Journal of Human Genetics, 2005
- Predictive testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a psychological framework for pre-test counsellingEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2000
- Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counsellingJournal of Medical Genetics, 2000
- Counselling the genetically ‘at risk’: The poetics and politics of ‘non-directiveness’Health, Risk & Society, 1999
- The new genetics and the politics of public healthCritical Public Health, 1998
- What do we mean by genetic testing?Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997
- Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)Social Science & Medicine, 1997
- Predictive genetics: the cultural implications of supplying probable futuresPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- Decision-making in the context of genetic riskPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996