Analytical and clinical sensitivity of West Nile virus RNA screening and supplemental assays available in 2003
- 22 March 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 45 (4) , 492-499
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0041-1132.2005.04382.x
Abstract
Transfusion-transmitted West Nile virus (WNV) infections were first reported in 2002, which led to rapid development of investigational nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT). A study was conducted to evaluate sensitivities of WNV screening and supplemental NAT assays first employed in 2003. Twenty-five member-coded panels were distributed to NAT assay manufacturers. Panels included five pedigreed WNV standards (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 copies/mL), 15 or 16 donor units with very-low-level viremia identified through 2003 screening, and four or five negative control samples. Samples were tested neat in 10 replicates by all assays; for NAT screening assays, 10 replicates were also performed on dilutions consistent with minipool (MP)-NAT. The viral load distribution for 142 MP-NAT yield donations was characterized, relative to the analytical sensitivity of MP-NAT systems. Analytical sensitivities (50% limits of detection [LoD] based on Poisson model of detection of WNV standards) for screening NAT assays ranged from 3.4 to 29 copies per mL; when diluted consistent with MP pool sizes, the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays was reduced to 43 to 309 copies per mL. Analytical sensitivity of supplemental assays ranged from 1.5 to 7.7 copies per mL (50% LoD). Detection of RNA in donor units varied consistent with analytical LoD of assays. Detection of low-level viremia after MP dilutions was particularly compromised for seropositive units, probably reflecting lower viral loads in the postseroconversion phase. Based on the viral load distribution of MP-NAT yield donations (median, 3519 copies/mL; range, < 50-690,000), 13 to 24 percent of units had viral loads below the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays run in MP-NAT format. WNV screening and supplemental assays had generally excellent analytical sensitivity, comparable to human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus NAT assays. The presence of low-level viremic units during epidemic periods and the impact of MP dilutions on sensitivity, however, suggest the need for further improvements in sensitivity as well as a role for targeted individual-donation NAT in epidemic regions.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of West Nile virus RNA and antibody in frozen plasma components from a voluntary market withdrawal during the 2002 peak epidemicTransfusion, 2005
- Collaborative study to evaluate a working reagent for West Nile virus RNA detection by nucleic acid testingTransfusion, 2004
- West Nile virus blood transfusion‐related infection despite nucleic acid testingTransfusion, 2004
- Triggers for switching from minipool testing by nucleic acid technology to individual‐donation nucleic acid testing for West Nile virus: Analysis of 2003 data to inform 2004 decision makingTransfusion, 2004
- Detection of HIV-1 and HCV Infections among Antibody-Negative Blood Donors by Nucleic Acid–Amplification TestingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- A Critical Role for Induced IgM in the Protection against West Nile Virus InfectionThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2003
- Emerging Infections, Transfusion Safety, and EpidemiologyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Transmission of West Nile Virus through Blood Transfusion in the United States in 2002New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Transmission of West Nile Virus from an Organ Donor to Four Transplant RecipientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Provisional Surveillance Summary of the West Nile Virus Epidemic—United States, January–November 2002Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2003