Can the ubiquitous power of mobile phones be used to improve health outcomes in developing countries?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Globalization and Health
- Vol. 2 (1) , 9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-2-9
Abstract
The ongoing policy debate about the value of communications technology in promoting development objectives is diverse. Some view computer/web/phone communications technology as insufficient to solve development problems while others view communications technology as assisting all sections of the population. This paper looks at evidence to support or refute the idea that fixed and mobile telephones is, or could be, an effective healthcare intervention in developing countries. A Web-based and library database search was undertaken including the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, (nursing & allied health), Evidence Based Medicine (EBM), POPLINE, BIOSIS, and Web of Science, AIDSearch (MEDLINE AIDS/HIV Subset, AIDSTRIALS & AIDSDRUGS) databases. Evidence can be found to both support and refute the proposition that fixed and mobile telephones is, or could be, an effective healthcare intervention in developing countries. It is difficult to generalize because of the different outcome measurements and the small number of controlled studies. There is almost no literature on using mobile telephones as a healthcare intervention for HIV, TB, malaria, and chronic conditions in developing countries. Clinical outcomes are rarely measured. Convincing evidence regarding the overall cost-effectiveness of mobile phone " telemedicine" is still limited and good-quality studies are rare. Evidence of the cost effectiveness of such interventions to improve adherence to medicines is also quite weak. The developed world model of personal ownership of a phone may not be appropriate to the developing world in which shared mobile telephone use is important. Sharing may be a serious drawback to use of mobile telephones as a healthcare intervention in terms of stigma and privacy, but its magnitude is unknown. One advantage, however, of telephones with respect to adherence to medicine in chronic care models is its ability to create a multi-way interaction between patient and provider(s) and thus facilitate the dynamic nature of this relationship. Regulatory reforms required for proper operation of basic and value-added telecommunications services are a priority if mobile telecommunications are to be used for healthcare initiatives.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nurse administered telephone intervention for blood pressure control: a patient-tailored multifactorial interventionPatient Education and Counseling, 2005
- Improving Asthma Control Through Telemedicine: A Study of Short-Message ServiceTelemedicine and e-Health, 2005
- Hard choices: rationing antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS in AfricaThe Lancet, 2005
- Feasibility of Collecting Diary Data From Asthma Patients Through Mobile Phones and SMS (Short Message Service): Response Rate Analysis and Focus Group Evaluation From a Pilot StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2004
- Cellular phone transferred self blood glucose monitoring: prerequisites for positive outcomePractical Diabetes International, 2004
- The Application of Telemedicine Technology to a Directly Observed Therapy Program for Tuberculosis: A Pilot ProjectClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Telemedicine: barriers and opportunities in the 21st centuryJournal of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Review of Computer-generated Outpatient Health Behavior Interventions: Clinical Encounters "in Absentia"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2001
- The effect of an alphanumeric paging system on patient compliance with medicinal regimensAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 1996
- Telephone Modem Access Improves Diabetes Control in Those with Insulin-Requiring DiabetesDiabetes Care, 1992