Can Reading Disabilities Be Diagnosed Without Using Intelligence Tests?
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Vol. 24 (3) , 178-186
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949102400306
Abstract
Unlike conventional procedures, which use IQ in making diagnostic and eligibility decisions regarding learning disabilities, this demonstration study used listening comprehension and other reading-related tasks to make a differential diagnosis of reading disabilities. Tests of listening and reading comprehension were administered to 180 children from Grades 3 through 8. A regression equation was then derived to predict reading comprehension from listening comprehension. The regression equation was applied to the listening comprehension scores of seven children from Grades 3 to 8 who had reading difficulties, and their reading comprehension was predicted. Based on the discrepancy between their actual reading comprehension and the predicted reading comprehension, their reading difficulty was attributed to one of the following three factors: (a) poor decoding, (b) poor comprehension, or (c) a combination of poor decoding and poor comprehension. The validity of these diagnostic decisions was assessed by testing independently these children's word-decoding skill and reading speed. The results suggest that this diagnostic procedure has potential utility.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Listening and Reading Performance with Children in Three Educational PlacementsJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
- The Problems of Definition and Differentiation and the Need for a Classification SchemaJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
- Decoding, Reading, and Reading DisabilityRemedial and Special Education, 1986
- Learning Disability vs. Reading Disability: A Survey of Practitioners' Diagnostic Populations and Test InstrumentsLearning Disability Quarterly, 1985
- Intelligence Testing and the Field of Learning Disabilities: A Historical and Critical PerspectiveLearning Disability Quarterly, 1984
- The Debate over Learning Disability vs. Reading Disability: A Survey of Practitioners' Populations and Remedial MethodsLearning Disability Quarterly, 1983
- Let's End the Reading Disabilities/Learning Disabilities DebateJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
- An Evaluation of the Regression Discrepancy Method for Identifying Children With Learning DisabilitiesThe Journal of Special Education, 1980
- Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approachJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1973
- Listening and ReadingThe Elementary School Journal, 1965