The Writer, the Reader, and the Scientific Text
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
- Vol. 15 (2) , 163-174
- https://doi.org/10.2190/x9d9-v33e-ren0-pdqm
Abstract
Using examples from journal articles in the natural sciences, the author argues that scientific writing has conventions of personality which are rhetorically constrained. Writers represent themselves and their readers at specific junctures in the text through the use of pronominals, verbs entailing reasoning, modals expressing possibility or obligation, and adjectives or adverbs which qualify assertions. Seven rhetorical acts are identified which are likely to bring the writer and/or the reader to the surface of the text: 1) acknowledging assistance; 2) referring to one's own research; 3) justifying hypothesis selection; 4) justifying methods chosen or departures from established methods; 5) explaining adjustments to results or inability to interpret results; 6) stating conclusions and comparing conclusions to those of other studies; and 7) discussing implications for reader behavior.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Style and Its Consequences: Do as I Do, Not as I SayCollege English, 1981
- Grammatical Voice and Person in Technical Writing: Results of a SurveyJournal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1980
- Teaching Scientific Writing Humanistically: From Theory to ActionEnglish Journal, 1978
- I. INTRODUCTIONPublished by Harvard University Press ,1959