Humans Rapidly Estimate Expected Gain in Movement Planning
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 17 (11) , 981-988
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01816.x
Abstract
We studied human movement planning in tasks in which subjects selected one of two goals that differed in expected gain. Each goal configuration consisted of a target circle and a partially overlapping penalty circle. Rapid hits into the target region led to a monetary bonus; accidental hits into the penalty region incurred a penalty. The outcomes assigned to target and penalty regions and the spatial arrangement of those regions were varied. Subjects preferred configurations with higher expected gain whether selection involved a rapid pointing movement or a choice by key press. Movements executed to select one of two goal configurations exhibited the same movement dynamics as pointing movements directed at a single configuration, and were executed with the same high efficiency. Our results suggest that humans choose near-optimal strategies when planning their movement, and can base their selection of strategy on a rapid judgment about the expected gain associated with possible movement goals.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance TestsPsychological Science, 2005
- Optimal eye movement strategies in visual searchNature, 2005
- Matching Behavior and the Representation of Value in the Parietal CortexScience, 2004
- Predicting Risk Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation.Psychological Review, 2004
- Statistical Decision Theory and Biological VisionPublished by Wiley ,2002
- The Psychophysics ToolboxSpatial Vision, 1997
- Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.Psychological Review, 1996
- Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements.Psychological Review, 1988
- Information capacity of discrete motor responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964
- Reaction Time for the Amendment of a ResponseQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949