Energy Analysis of Metal-Ligand Bonding in Transition Metal Complexes with Terminal Group-13 Diyl Ligands (CO)4Fe-ER, Fe(EMe)5and Ni(EMe)4(E = B−Tl; R = Cp, N(SiH3)2, Ph, Me) Reveals Significant π Bonding in Homoleptical Molecules
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Vol. 123 (8) , 1683-1693
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ja002845g
Abstract
The metal-ligand bonds of the title compounds have been investigated with the help of an energy partitioning analysis at the DFT level. It was found that the attractive orbital interactions between Fe and ER in (CO)4Fe-ER arise mainly from Fe ← ER σ donation. Only the boron diyl complexes (CO)4Fe-BR have significant contributions by Fe → ER π back-donation, but the Fe ← BR σ-donation remains the dominant orbital interaction term. The relative contributions of Fe-ER σ donation and π back-donation are only slightly altered when R changes from a good π donor to a poor π donor. Electrostatic forces between the metal fragment and the diyl ligand are always attractive, and they are very strong. They arise from the attraction between the local negative charge concentration at the overall positively charged donor atom E of the Lewis base ER and the positive charge of the iron nucleus. Electrostatic interactions and covalent interactions in (CO)4Fe-ER complexes have a similar strength when E is Al−Tl and when R is a good π donor substituent. The Fe-BR bonds of the boron carbonyldiyl complexes have a significantly higher ionic character than the heavier group-13 analogues. Weak π donor substituents R enhance the ionic character of the (CO)4Fe-ER bond. The metal-ligand bonds in the homoleptic complexes Fe(EMe)5 and Ni(EMe)4 have a higher ionic character than in (CO)4Fe-ER. The contribution of the TM → ER π back-donation to the ΔEorb term becomes clearly higher and contributes significantly to the total orbital interactions in the homoleptic complexes where no other π acceptor ligands are present. The ligand BMe is nearly as strong a π acceptor in Fe(BMe)5 as CO is in Fe(CO)5.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Roothaan-Hartree-Fock-Slater atomic wave functions: Single-zeta, double-zeta, and extended Slater-type basis sets for 87Fr-103LrPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- [(dcpe)Pt(ECp*)2] (E = Al, Ga): Synthesis, Structure, and Bonding Situation of the First Aluminum(I) and Gallium(I) Complexes of Phosphine-Substituted Transition Metal CentersOrganometallics, 2000
- The Nature of the Transition Metal−Carbonyl Bond and the Question about the Valence Orbitals of Transition Metals. A Bond-Energy Decomposition Analysis of TM(CO)6q (TMq = Hf2-, Ta-, W, Re+, Os2+, Ir3+)Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2000
- A Theoretical Study of Free and Fe(CO)4-Complexed Borylenes (Boranediyls) and Heavier Congeners: The Nature of the Iron−Group 13 Element BondingJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1999
- Pentamethylcyclopentadienylindium (Cp*In) as Terminal Ligand in the Chemistry of ChromiumOrganometallics, 1999
- Synthesis and Characterization of a Terminal Borylene (Boranediyl) ComplexJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1998
- [(η5‐Cp*)Al-Fe(CO)4] – Synthese, Struktur, BindungsverhältnisseAngewandte Chemie, 1997
- The transition metal-carbonyl bondAccounts of Chemical Research, 1993
- Theoretical study on the relative strengths of the metal-hydrogen and metal-methyl bonds in complexes of middle to late transition metalsJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1987
- Relativistic Dirac-Fock expectation values for atoms with Z = 1 to Z = 120Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 1973