Ecological Bias, Confounding, and Effect Modification
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 18 (1) , 269-274
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/18.1.269
Abstract
Greenland S (Division of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA) and Morgenstern H. Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification. International Journal of Epidemiology 1989, 18: 269–274. Ecological bias is sometimes attributed to confounding by the group variable (ie the variable used to define the ecological groups), or to risk factors associated with the group variable. We show that the group variable need not be a confounder (in the strict epidemiological sense) for ecological bias to occur: effect modification can lead to profound ecological bias, whether or not the group variable or the effect modifier are independent risk factors. Furthermore, an extraneous risk factor need not be associated with the study variable at the individual level in order to produce ecological bias. Thus the conditions for the production of ecological bias by a covariate are much broader than the conditions for the production of individual-level confounding by a covariate. We also show that standardization or ecological control of variables responsible for ecological bias are generally insufficient to remove such bias.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Relative Risks Obtained in Ecological and Individual Studies: Some Methodological ConsiderationsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- Identifiability, Exchangeability, and Epidemiological ConfoundingInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research.American Journal of Public Health, 1982
- CONFOUNDING: ESSENCE AND DETECTION1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1981