Trends in Labor Induction in the United States: Is It True That What Goes Up Must Come Down?
- 21 May 2004
- Vol. 31 (2) , 148-151
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00294.x
Abstract
Three recent studies examined the national trend in labor induction in the United States. All show a doubling in the rate of induction during the 1990s, although vital statistics data show a consistently higher trend than that obtained from national hospital discharge data. Neither data source adequately documents the full range of indications for induction, its timing, hospital staffing considerations, and other factors that may play a role. Although rates of induction of labor may be leveling off, despite a lack of scientific evidence for its widespread use, rates are likely to remain at current levels for the next few years.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Labor Induction Rate Variation in Upstate New York: What Is the Difference?Birth, 2003
- Elective induction: An analysis of economic and health consequencesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategiesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Reliability of Birth Certificate Data: A Multi-Hospital Comparison to Medical Records InformationMaternal and Child Health Journal, 2002
- Invited Commentary: Using Vital Statistics Databases for Perinatal Epidemiology: Does the Quality Go In Before the Name Goes On?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean DeliveryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Elective induction of labor in the USACurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1998
- Methods of cervical ripening and labor inductionJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1997
- Induction of laborInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1996