Murphy's Law and Market Anomalies
- 31 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by With Intelligence LLC in The Journal of Portfolio Management
- Vol. 25 (2) , 53-69
- https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1999.319734
Abstract
Many researchers have uncovered empirical regularities in stock market returns. If these regularities persist, investors can expect to achieve superior performance. Unfortunately, nature can be perverse. Once an apparent anomaly is publicized, only too often it disappears or goes into reverse. The latter seems to have happened to the small-firm premium. The authors show that after the U.K. size premium was documented and disseminated, the historical small-cap premium of 6% was replaced by a small-cap discount of around 6%. The authors present evidence of and some explanations for the disappearance of the small-firm premium.This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- A monthly effect in stock returnsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Anomalies or illusions? Evidence from stock markets in eighteen countriesJournal of International Money and Finance, 1994
- Beta and ReturnThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 1993
- The January Anomaly: Effects of Low Share Price, Transaction Costs, and Bid-Ask BiasThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- NoiseThe Journal of Finance, 1986
- The Turn-of-the-Year in CanadaThe Journal of Finance, 1984
- Pay attention to neglected firms!*The Journal of Portfolio Management, 1983
- The relationship between return and market value of common stocksJournal of Financial Economics, 1981
- Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market HypothesisThe Journal of Finance, 1977
- An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income NumbersJournal of Accounting Research, 1968