Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in patients with HIV/AIDS in Côte d’Ivoire: a trial-based analysis
- 12 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 19 (12) , 1299-1308
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000180101.80888.c6
Abstract
In 2000, WHO/UNAIDS recommended co-trimoxazole prophylaxis for persons at early stages of HIV infection (WHO stage > or = 2) in sub-Saharan Africa.To assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for initiation of co-trimoxazole in Côte d'Ivoire.Cost-effectiveness analysis with an HIV simulation model using clinical and cost data from a randomized trial of co-trimoxazole in HIV-infected adults.The study included HIV-infected patients in Côte d'Ivoire, with median age 33 years. Thirty-four percent were classified as WHO stage 2, 59% as stage 3, and 7% as stage 4. The mean CD4 cell count was 331 x 10(6) cells/l. The interventions were no prophylaxis, clinical criteria-based co-trimoxazole initiation (early: WHO stage > or = 2; late: WHO stage > or = 3), CD4-based co-trimoxazole initiation (< 500, < 200, < 50 x 10(6) CD4 cells/l). The outcome measures were life expectancy, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness.The most effective strategy, initiation of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis at WHO stage > or = 2, increased undiscounted life expectancy by 5.2 months, discounted life expectancy by 4.4 months, and lifetime costs by US dollars 60, compared with no prophylaxis. Delaying prophylaxis initiation until WHO stage >or = 3 was less costly and less effective. All CD4-based strategies were dominated. The incremental cost-effectiveness of early versus late co-trimoxazole prophylaxis initiation was US dollars 200/year of life gained. Results were stable despite wide variations in plausible assumptions about bacterial resistance and the prophylaxis efficacy on co-trimoxazole-resistant strains.For HIV-infected adults in Côte d'Ivoire, co-trimoxazole prophylaxis is reasonably cost-effective and most effective if initiated when WHO stage > or = 2. Early co-trimoxazole prophylaxis will prevent complications prior to antiretroviral therapy initiation and should be considered an essential component of care for early HIV in sub-Saharan Africa.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Related Opportunistic Infections in Sub‐Saharan AfricaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Morbidity and Mortality in South African Gold Miners: Impact of Untreated Disease Due to Human Immunodeficiency VirusClinical Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Prophylaxis for Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Related Pneumocystis carinii PneumoniaArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2002
- Preventing opportunistic infections among human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults in African countries.The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2001
- HIV-1–Related Morbidity in Adults, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: A Nidus for Bacterial DiseasesJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001
- Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in adults infected with HIV in low-income countriesCurrent Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Initiating co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in HIV-infected patients in Africa: an evaluation of the provisional WHO/UNAIDS recommendationsAIDS, 2001
- The Cost Effectiveness of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Efficacy of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole prophylaxis to decrease morbidity and mortality in HIV-1-infected patients with tuberculosis in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Early chemoprophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole for HIV-1-infected adults in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999