Selectivity and Targeting in Income Support: The Australian Experience
Open Access
- 1 July 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Social Policy
- Vol. 20 (3) , 299-326
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279400018900
Abstract
The Australian income support system is often characterised as one of the most selective in the Western industrialised world. This paper examines the sense in which the Australian system is selective, and discusses the distinction between selectivity and targeting in income support provisions. Developments in social security outlays and recipient numbers over the last two decades are compared with those occurring since 1983, in order that the nature and impact of recent policies introduced to increase targeting can be identified. The analysis indicates that increases in recipient numbers have been the dominant factor underlying the past growth in social security expenditure. The distinction between selectivity and targeting of income support provisions is then explained with reference to the concepts of eligibility and entitlement. A framework is developed to illustrate how recent policies have restrained the growth in social security recipient numbers by policies which have increased income support targeting. These moves have not always produced a consistently more selective system of income support, an issue which is explored with the use of an index of the degree of selectivity of social security expenditures developed specifically for this purpose.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Poverty Traps in the Australian Social Security SystemEconomic Analysis and Policy, 1989
- The Impact of Income Maintenance Payments on Poverty in Britain, 1975The Economic Journal, 1979