Minimal changes in reflux esophagitis: red ones and white ones
- 24 March 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in The Esophagus
- Vol. 41 (2) , 95-99
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1775-4
Abstract
Minimal change esophagitis is commonly accepted as part of the spectrum of reflux esophagitis in Japan as well as in many reflux esophagitis classification systems. However, the Los Angeles system excludes minimal changes as a sign of reflux esophagitis because of low interobserver agreement. The high prevalence of minimal change esophagitis suggests that many endoscopists can recognize such findings in their patients' esophagi. However, we do not have a clear definition of minimal changes, which requires proven interobserver agreement, histological evidence, and response data to therapeutic intervention. Furthermore, erythematous changes (red ones) and acanthotic changes (white ones) are not distinguished in the definition of minimal change used in Japan. It is time to clarify such issues.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lugol chromoendoscopy as a diagnostic tool in so-called endoscopy-negative GERDGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Minimal change oesophagitis: a disease with characteristic differences to erosive oesophagitisAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2005
- Minimal Change Esophagitis: Prospective Comparison of Endoscopic and Histological Markers between Patients with Non-Erosive Reflux Disease and Normal Controls Using Magnifying EndoscopyDigestive Diseases, 2004
- Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classificationGut, 1999
- Diagnostic value of histology in non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.Gut, 1996
- Comparison of omeprazole and cimetidine in reflux oesophagitis: symptomatic, endoscopic, and histological evaluations.Gut, 1990
- Reflux EsophagitisScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1990
- Acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a multicentre trial to compare 150 mg ranitidine b.d. with 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1989
- Histologic evaluation of chronic gastroesophageal refluxDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1984
- When is esophagitis healed?Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1982