Reduced growth and seed set following chemical induction of pathogen defence: does systemic acquired resistance (SAR) incur allocation costs?
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Ecology
- Vol. 88 (4) , 645-654
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00479.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- On integrating molecular and ecological studies of plant resistance: variety of mechanisms and breadth of antagonistsJournal of Ecology, 2000
- Benzothiadiazole (BTH) induces resistance in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var botrytis) to downy mildew of crucifers caused by Peronospora parasiticaCrop Protection, 1999
- Costs of jasmonate‐induced responses in plants competing for limited resourcesEcology Letters, 1998
- Salicylic acid‐independent induction of pathogenesis‐related protein transcripts by sugars is dependent on leaf developmental stageFEBS Letters, 1996
- Relative growth rate correlates negatively with pathogen resistance in radish: the role of plant chemistryPlant, Cell & Environment, 1996
- Benefits and Costs of Defense in a Neotropical ShrubEcology, 1995
- The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or DefendThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1992
- The Cost of Tundra Plant Structures: Evaluation of Concepts and CurrenciesThe American Naturalist, 1989
- Field Protection of Cucumber, Watermelon, and Muskmelon Against Colletotrichum lagenarium by Colletotrichum lagenariumPhytopathology®, 1977
- Comparative chlorine requirements of different plant speciesPlant and Soil, 1957