Finding Audiences, Changing Beliefs: The Structure of Research Use in Canadian Health Policy
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- Published by Duke University Press in Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
- Vol. 15 (3) , 525-542
- https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-15-3-525
Abstract
The impact of research information depends on its ability to change beliefs or policy assumptions within the relevant audiences. As a hybrid of American and British systems, Canada's chosen decision-making structure for policy-making and its legislative framework for health insurance make these audiences unclear and not readily accessible. This factor and historical characteristics of the research community which made them only partially responsive to the values of decisionmakers provide an explanation for the limited past use of research information in Canadian health policy. More recently, improved responsiveness by researchers and an emerging definition of the audiences by legislative policymakers are bringing about a gradual increase in the potential impact of research at the levels of administrative and clinical policy. Because of continuing decision-making constraints on legislative policy, however, impact at this level is predicted to remain diffuse, with only cautious acceptance of the changes in beliefs implied by research.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health Policy and the Politics of Research in the United StatesJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1990
- Controlling Health Expenditures — the Canadian RealityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Paying Physicians in Canada: Minding Our Ps and QsHealth Affairs, 1989
- Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy ChangeKnowledge, 1987
- Banning Extra-Billing in Canada: Just What the Doctor Didn't OrderCanadian Public Policy, 1987
- Canada's Health Care SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- COMMON PROBLEMS, ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS: A COMPARISON OF THE CANADIAN AND AMERICAN HEALTH SYSTEMSPolicy Studies Journal, 1986
- The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical FindingsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1982
- Clinical Policies and the Quality of Clinical PracticeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979