Surviving Intensive Care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable
Top Cited Papers
- 21 January 2003
- journal article
- expert panel
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 29 (3) , 368-377
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1624-8
Abstract
The traditional goal of intensive care has been to decrease short-term mortality. While worthy, this goal fails to address the issue of what it means to survive intensive care. Key questions include whether intensive care survivors have optimal long-term outcomes and whether ICU care decisions would change if we knew more about these outcomes. The 2002 Brussels Roundtable, "Surviving Intensive care", highlighted these issues, summarizing the available evidence on natural history and risk factors for critical illness and outlining future directions for care and research. Critical illness is associated with a wide array of serious and concerning long-term sequelae that interfere with optimal patient-centered outcomes. Although traditional short-term outcomes, such as hospital mortality, remain extremely important, they are not likely to be adequate surrogates for subsequent patient-centered outcomes. As such, it is important to focus specifically on how critical illness and intensive care affects a patient's and relatives' long-term health and well-being. There are a large number of potential pre-, intra-, and post-ICU factors that may improve or worsen these outcomes, and these factors are subjects for future research. In addition, future clinical trials of ICU therapies should include long-term follow-up of survival, quality of life, morbidity, functional status, and costs of care. Follow-up ought to be for at least six months. The SF-36 and EuroQOL EQ-5D are the best-suited instruments for measuring quality of life in multicenter critical care trials though further methodologic research and instrument design is encouraged. There are also opportunities today to improve care. Key to taking advantage of such opportunities is the need for a global awareness of critical illness as an entity that begins and ends outside the ICU 'box'. Specific interventions that show promise for improving care include ICU discharge screening tools and ICU follow-up clinics.Keywords
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- School-Age Consequences of Birth Weight Less Than 750 g: A Review and UpdateDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 2000
- Increased Mortality Associated with Growth Hormone Treatment in Critically Ill AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Effects of an organized critical care service on outcomes and resource utilizationCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Survival and quality of life after intensive careIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- THE IMPACT OF FULL-TIME SURGICAL INTENSIVISTS ON ICU UTILIZATION AND MORTALITYCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Demands of Illness and Individual, Dyadic, and Family Adaptation in Chronic IllnessWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of lifeHealth Policy, 1990
- Hospital charges and long-term survival of ICU versus non-ICU patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1982
- Medical Intensive Care: Indications, Interventions, and OutcomesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980