ON ORGANISATIONAL STORIES AND MYTHS: WHY IT IS EASIER TO SLAY A DRAGON THAN TO KILL A MYTH
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Sociology
- Vol. 6 (4) , 427-442
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026858091006004004
Abstract
The author explores how events in organisations are turned into stories. Three major types of story are identified and illustrated: the comic, the tragic, and the epic, as well as a number of hybrids. The emotions generated by these stories are explored as well as some of the meanings which they reveal. The author then discusses why people espouse particular stories with almost religious fervour and suggests that organisational stories are essentially fulfilments of unconscious wishes. In conclusion, he argues that stories and the `careers' which they pursue in organisations can illuminate that dimension referred to as the unmanaged organisation, where desires and pleasure predominate over rationality and expedience.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implicit MeaningsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2002
- Myth, Meaning and Work OrganizationOrganization Studies, 1989
- Beyond Organizational BoundariesAdministration & Society, 1986
- Sociological Aspects of Organizational SymbolismOrganization Studies, 1986
- Commentary on Anton C. Zijderveld's Trend Report on `The Sociology of Humour and Laughter'Current Sociology, 1984
- The Uniqueness Paradox in Organizational StoriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- On Studying Organizational CulturesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979
- Space Jokes as Indication of Attitudes Toward SpaceJournal of Social Issues, 1961
- Some Social Functions of LaughterHuman Relations, 1959