Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Augmentative and Alternative Communication
- Vol. 11 (1) , 2-5
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619512331277079
Abstract
Research within augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) frequently involves the use of augmentative systems users as subjects. This article will make an argument for using nondisabled communicators as subjects in AAC research.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subject selection in AAC research: Decision pointsAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1995
- Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC researchAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1995
- Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech delivered at normal and slow presentation ratesAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1994
- Comparison of relative demands implicated in direct selection and scanning: Considerations from normal childrenAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1994
- Evaluation of keystroke savings across five assistive communication technologiesAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1992
- An initial vocabulary for nonspeaking preschool children based on developmental and environmental language sourcesAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1992
- Frequency of word usage by nondisabled peers in integrated preschool classroomsAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1989
- The effects of representativeness and concreteness on the “guessability” of BlissymbolsAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1988
- Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and PicsymsAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1987
- A SYSTEM FOR THE TRANSFER OF INSTRUCTIONS IN NATURAL SETTINGSSemiotica, 1975