International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 35 (8) , 1381-1395
- https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000078924.61453.fb
Abstract
Physical inactivity is a global concern, but diverse physical activity measures in use prevent international comparisons. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed as an instrument for cross-national monitoring of physical activity and inactivity. Between 1997 and 1998, an International Consensus Group developed four long and four short forms of the IPAQ instruments (administered by telephone interview or self-administration, with two alternate reference periods, either the “last 7 d” or a “usual week” of recalled physical activity). During 2000, 14 centers from 12 countries collected reliability and/or validity data on at least two of the eight IPAQ instruments. Test-retest repeatability was assessed within the same week. Concurrent (inter-method) validity was assessed at the same administration, and criterion IPAQ validity was assessed against the CSA (now MTI) accelerometer. Spearman’s correlation coefficients are reported, based on the total reported physical activity. Overall, the IPAQ questionnaires produced repeatable data (Spearman’s ρ clustered around 0.8), with comparable data from short and long forms. Criterion validity had a median ρ of about 0.30, which was comparable to most other self-report validation studies. The “usual week” and “last 7 d” reference periods performed similarly, and the reliability of telephone administration was similar to the self-administered mode. The IPAQ instruments have acceptable measurement properties, at least as good as other established self-reports. Considering the diverse samples in this study, IPAQ has reasonable measurement properties for monitoring population levels of physical activity among 18- to 65-yr-old adults in diverse settings. The short IPAQ form “last 7 d recall” is recommended for national monitoring and the long form for research requiring more detailed assessment.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in childrenMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- Field Evaluation of the Computer Science and Application's Inc. Activity Monitor during Running and Skating Training in Adolescent AthletesInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2000
- Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the fieldMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
- Compendium of Physical Activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensitiesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
- Assessment of Physical Activity: An International PerspectiveResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
- Objective Monitoring of Physical Activity Using Motion Sensors and Heart RateResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
- Assessment of Physical Activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., Accelerometer: Laboratory versus Field ValidationResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
- Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometerMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1998
- Physical Activity and Public HealthJAMA, 1995
- Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments.Psychological Assessment, 1994