Biofilms, Bacteria and Bladder Catheters A Clinical Study
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 64 (4) , 395-398
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1989.tb06050.x
Abstract
Summary— Biofilms were present on 16 of 33 urethral catheters examined. In 11 cases the catheter carried a different microbial flora from that of the bladder urine. The length of time the catheter was in situ did not influence biofilm formation, and all types of materials tested supported biofilm growth. Biofilms were seen on 2 of the 7 catheters where prophylactic antibiotics had been used.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of in vitro Encrustation on Silicone and Hydrogel‐coated Latex CathetersBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Urothelial Reaction to Ureteric Intubation A Clinical StudyBritish Journal of Urology, 1987
- Bacterial Biofilms in Nature and DiseaseAnnual Review of Microbiology, 1987
- Double‐blind Study Comparing Aztreonam with Placebo for Prophylaxis of Infection following Prostatic SurgeryBritish Journal of Urology, 1987
- An Experimental Study of Hydrophilic Plastics for Urological UseBritish Journal of Urology, 1986
- Antibiotics for the prevention of septicaemia in urologyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1982
- Short-term prophylaxis with cefotaxime for prostatic surgery.BMJ, 1982
- Regrowth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Other Bacteria after the Bactericidal Action of Carbenicillin and Other -Lactam AntibioticsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1981
- Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: A Critique of Recent TrialsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1980
- Clinical Aspects of Bacteremia after Manipulation of the Genitourinary TractThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1973