Populations at risk for severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 23 August 2013
- Vol. 347 (aug23 1) , f5061
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5061
Abstract
Objective To evaluate risk factors for severe outcomes in patients with seasonal and pandemic influenza. Design Systematic review. Study selection Observational studies reporting on risk factor-outcome combinations of interest in participants with influenza. Outcomes included death, ventilator support, admission to hospital, admission to an intensive care unit, pneumonia, and composite outcomes. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to March 2011. Risk of bias assessment Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the risk of bias. GRADE framework to evaluate the quality of evidence. Results 63 537 articles were identified of which 234 with a total of 610 782 participants met the inclusion criteria. The evidence supporting risk factors for severe outcomes of influenza ranged from being limited to absent. This was particularly relevant for the relative lack of data for non-2009 H1N1 pandemics and for seasonal influenza studies. Limitations in the published literature included lack of power and lack of adjustment for confounders was widespread: adjusted risk estimates were provided for only 5% of risk factor-outcome comparisons in 39 of 260 (15%) studies. The level of evidence was low for “any risk factor” (odds ratio for mortality 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.90 to 4.05 for pandemic influenza and 2.04, 1.74 to 2.39 for seasonal influenza), obesity (2.74, 1.56 to 4.80 and 30.1, 1.74 to 2.39), cardiovascular diseases (2.92, 1.76 to 4.86 and 1.97, 1.06 to 3.67), and neuromuscular disease (2.68, 1.91 to 3.75 and 3.21, 1.84 to 5.58). The level of evidence was very low for all other risk factors. Some well accepted risk factors such as pregnancy and belonging to an ethnic minority group could not be identified as risk factors. In contrast, women who were less than four weeks post partum had a significantly increased risk of death from pandemic influenza (4.43, 1.24 to 15.81). Conclusion The level of evidence to support risk factors for influenza related complications is low and some well accepted risk factors, including pregnancy and ethnicity, could not be confirmed as risks. Rigorous and adequately powered studies are needed.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Community controls were preferred to hospital controls in a case–control study where the cases are derived from the hospitalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Risk of severe outcomes among patients admitted to hospital with pandemic (H1N1) influenzaCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010
- Severe 2009 H1N1 Influenza in Pregnant and Postpartum Women in CaliforniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization - report of the extraordinary meeting on the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic, 7 July 2009.2009
- Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Hospitalization in Children With Influenza Virus InfectionPediatric Emergency Care, 2009
- Estimating the relative hazard by the ratio of logarithms of event-free proportionsContemporary Clinical Trials, 2008
- A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpointsStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Excess Deaths Associated With Underweight, Overweight, and ObesityJAMA, 2005
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003