Comparison of Arctic Climate Simulations by Uncoupled and Coupled Global Models
Open Access
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Climate
- Vol. 15 (12) , 1429-1446
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1429:coacsb>2.0.co;2
Abstract
Simulations of present-day Arctic climate are assessed from suites of 1) 13 global atmosphere-only models from the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-II) and 2) 8 coupled atmosphere–ocean–ice models from the Data Distribution Center of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The assessment highlights the impact of coupling on the simulated Arctic climate, and also the improvement of the uncoupled models relative to a previous (early 1990s) phase of the AMIP project. The across-model variance of the simulated air temperature is larger in the coupled models than in the uncoupled models, and the spatial pattern of the variance indicates that differences in the coupled models' simulated sea ice contribute to the larger variance of temperature. The coupled models are also several degrees colder than the uncoupled models during the winter half of the year. As was the case with the earlier AMIP models, the simulated precipitation still exceeds the observational estimates, part... Abstract Simulations of present-day Arctic climate are assessed from suites of 1) 13 global atmosphere-only models from the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-II) and 2) 8 coupled atmosphere–ocean–ice models from the Data Distribution Center of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The assessment highlights the impact of coupling on the simulated Arctic climate, and also the improvement of the uncoupled models relative to a previous (early 1990s) phase of the AMIP project. The across-model variance of the simulated air temperature is larger in the coupled models than in the uncoupled models, and the spatial pattern of the variance indicates that differences in the coupled models' simulated sea ice contribute to the larger variance of temperature. The coupled models are also several degrees colder than the uncoupled models during the winter half of the year. As was the case with the earlier AMIP models, the simulated precipitation still exceeds the observational estimates, part...Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sea Ice Response to Wind Forcing from AMIP ModelsJournal of Climate, 2002
- The Arctic Ocean Response to the North Atlantic OscillationJournal of Climate, 2000
- The Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis global coupled model and its climateClimate Dynamics, 2000
- The Atmospheric Hydrologic Cycle over the Arctic Basin from Reanalyses. Part I: Comparison with Observations and Previous Studies*Journal of Climate, 2000
- The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustmentsClimate Dynamics, 2000
- Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model Experiments of Future Climate Change with an Explicit Representation of Sulfate Aerosol ScatteringJournal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 1999
- Simulation of the influence of solar radiation variations on the global climate with an ocean-atmosphere general circulation modelClimate Dynamics, 1997
- Year-to-Year Fluctuations of Global Mass Balance of Small Glaciers and Their Contribution to Sea-Level ChangesArctic and Alpine Research, 1997
- AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison ProjectBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1992
- Sea ice thickness distribution in the Arctic OceanCold Regions Science and Technology, 1987