Degradable systems:a survey of multistate system theory
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Vol. 13 (4) , 405-432
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928408828694
Abstract
The vast majority of reliability analyses assume that ccmponents and system are in either of two states: functioning or failed. However, in many real life situations we are actually able to distinguish among various 'Ilevels of performance" for both system and components. For such situations, the existing dichotomous model is a gross oversimplification and so models assuming degradable (multistate) systems and components are preferable since they are closer to reality.We present a survey of recent papers which treat the more I sophisticated and more realistic models in which components and systems may assume many states ranging from perfect functioning to complete failure. Our survey updates and complements a previous survey by El-Neweihi and Proschan (1980). Some new results are included.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bounding the Reliability of Multistate SystemsOperations Research, 1982
- Two suggestions of how to define a multistate coherent systemAdvances in Applied Probability, 1982
- Multidimensional IFRA ProcessesThe Annals of Probability, 1981
- Multistate reliability modelsJournal of Applied Probability, 1980
- A complete importance ranking for components of binary coherent systems, with extensions to multi‐state systemsNaval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1979
- Multivalued State Component SystemsThe Annals of Probability, 1979
- Multistate coherent systemsJournal of Applied Probability, 1978
- Coherent Systems with Multi-State ComponentsMathematics of Operations Research, 1978
- Cannibalization in multicomponent systems and the theory of reliabilityNaval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1968