Participation in Clinical Treatment Trials: Factors Affecting Participation for Women with Breast Cancer
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Women's Health
- Vol. 5 (6) , 585-592
- https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1996.5.585
Abstract
A retrospective descriptive study was conducted to investigate reasons for participation or nonparticipation in clinical treatment trials among women with breast cancer. Eighty-two breast cancer patients from a university-based medical center (n = 40) and a rural community hospital (n = 42) were selected from hospital tumor registry records. Thirty-minute face-to-face interviews were conducted to identify reasons for participation or nonparticipation in clinical treatment trials. Those who were not asked initially to participate in a trial (either because of trial unavailability or ineligibility or because they simply were not asked) were also asked if they would have participated had they been invited. Thirty-four (41%) were eligible for participation in one or more of the currently ongoing clinical trials. Only 20 (59%) of these women were invited to participate in a treatment trial by their physician. Of those asked, 14 (70%) agreed to participate. The majority of women who were not invited or not eligible stated that they would have participated if invited (50% of those not invited and 70% of those not eligible). Reasons for participation included personal benefit, altruism, doctor's recommendation, desire to foster the progress of medical research, and previous experience with cancer or medical research. Reasons women gave for not wanting to participate included negative beliefs about clinical trial research, lack of knowledge about clinical trial research, personal issues, and requirements of the protocol. Among eligible women, those who were not offered trial participation were older than those offered participation (average age 63 years vs. 54 years; p = 0.025). Logistic regression analysis identified two areas that predicted participation: knowledge about research studies (OR = 3.98; p = 0.05) and attitudes about research studies (OR = 3.6; p = 0.03). Working status, cancer detected by a physician, and knowledge of signs and symptoms of cancer were modestly associated with participation. Three areas of intervention were identified that would foster clinical trial participation for breast cancer: (1) protocols need to be designed with broader eligibility criteria or more protocols need to be written, (2) physicians should be encouraged to invite all eligible patients to participate, and (3) knowledge and attitudes of patients regarding clinical trials need to be improved.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent Cancer Trends in the United StatesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995
- What would you do if this were your ... wife, sister, mother, self?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Breast cancer in aging women. A population-based study of contrasts in stage, surgery, and survivalCancer, 1989
- Age As a Predictor of Diagnostic and Initial Treatment Intensity in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer PatientsJournal of Gerontology, 1989
- Cancer Treatment ProtocolsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1988
- Physicians’ Reasons for Not Entering Eligible Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Accrual of patients into a multihospital cancer clinical trial and its implications on planning future studiesAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984
- Cooperative groups and community hospitals. Measurement of impact in the community hospitalsCancer, 1983
- Accrual of radiotherapy patients to clinical trialsCancer, 1983
- Information and Participation Preferences Among Cancer PatientsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980