Can we learn lessons from the different ways stroke is managed in different countries?
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the Royal Society of Health
- Vol. 115 (3) , 143-147
- https://doi.org/10.1177/146642409511500303
Abstract
Stroke is a major health care problem in the European Union and consumes significant resources. The mortality rates from stroke and treatment strategies vary signifi cantly between member states. Only by comparison between centres in different member states with differing health care delivery can the effect of these varying approaches to the management of stroke on outcome be assessed. Conducting a study on a European wide basis in centres which are known to differ in terms of treatment strategies and outcomes allows an immediate analysis of the effectiveness, resource requirements and cost of diffe rent methods of managing stroke patients. This paper addresses the current burden of stroke and strategies for its management. An outline of a European Union project, assessing how stroke is managed in different countries, is provided with the aim of indicating a strategy for discovering and promoting more cost-effective services for stroke care in the future.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do stroke units save lives?The Lancet, 1993
- Medical treatment of acute ischaemic strokeThe Lancet, 1992
- SEPIVAC: a community-based study of stroke incidence in Umbria, Italy.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1991
- Consensus conference. Treatment of stroke.BMJ, 1988
- Acute stroke in a metropolitan area 1970 and 1980Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- Mortality from Cerebrovascular DiseaseNeuroepidemiology, 1983
- Incidence of stroke in Oxfordshire: first year's experience of a community stroke register.BMJ, 1983
- A synthesis of studies on stroke rehabilitationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1982
- Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ, 1981
- Management of acute stroke in the elderly: follow-up of a controlled trial.BMJ, 1980