Antithrombin III in critically ill patients: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
- 23 November 2007
- Vol. 335 (7632) , 1248-1251
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39398.682500.25
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the benefits and harms of antithrombin III in critically ill patients.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.Data sources CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, International Web of Science, LILACS, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and CINHAL (to November 2006); hand search of reference lists, contact with authors and experts, and search of registers of ongoing trials.Review methods Two reviewers independently selected parallel group randomised clinical trials comparing antithrombin with placebo or no intervention and extracted data related to study methods, interventions, outcomes, bias risk, and adverse events. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Trials in any type of critically ill patients in intensive care were eligible. All trials, irrespective of blinding or language status, that compared any antithrombin III regimen with no intervention or placebo were included. Trials were considered to be at low risk of bias if they had adequate randomisation procedure, blinding, and used intention to treat analysis. Risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated with fixed and random effects models according to heterogeneity. Main outcome measures Mortality, length of stay in intensive care or hospital, quality of life, severity of sepsis, respiratory failure, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of surgical intervention, intervention effect among various populations, and adverse events (such as bleeding).Results 20 trials randomly assigning 3458 patients met inclusion criteria. Eight trials had low risk of bias. Compared with placebo or no intervention, antithrombin III did not reduce overall mortality (relative risk 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.03). No subgroup analyses on risk of bias, populations of patients, or with and without adjuvant heparin yielded significant results. Antithrombin III increased the risk of bleeding events (1.52, 1.30 to 1.78). Heterogeneity was observed in only a few analyses.Conclusion Antithrombin III cannot be recommended for critically ill patients based on the available evidence.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A META-ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ANTICOAGULANT THERAPIES IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSISShock, 2003
- Statistics Notes: Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimatesBMJ, 2003
- The Anti‐Inflammatory Actions of Antithrombin – A ReviewActa Medica Austriaca, 2002
- Quality of life effects of antithrombin III in sepsis survivors: results from the KyberSept trial [ISRCTN22931023]Critical Care, 2002
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Antithrombin, heparin, and heparan sulfateCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of careCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Activated Protein C for Severe SepsisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysisBMJ, 2000
- Current treatment of sepsis and endotoxaemiaExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 2000