Whole-brain death reconsidered--physiological facts and philosophy.
Open Access
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 9 (1) , 32-37
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.9.1.32
Abstract
Four main areas generating confusion in discussion on brain death are identified as a) the relation of criteria of death to concepts of death, b) the argument about whether death is an event or a process, c) the inadequate differentiation of different neurological entities having different cardiac prognoses, and d) insufficient awareness of the separate issues of 'determining death' and 'allowing to die'. It is argued that if by death we mean the dissolution of the human 'organism as a whole', then whole-brain death is death. Behavioural patterns, legitimate in the presence of a cadaver, should be legitimate from the time whole-brain death is diagnosed.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- ABC of brain stem death. The position in the USA and elsewhere.BMJ, 1983
- ABC of brain stem death. Prognostic significance of a dead brain stem.BMJ, 1983
- ABC of brain stem death. Reappraising death.BMJ, 1982
- Brain death in three neurosurgical units.BMJ, 1981
- COGNITIVE DEATH: DIFFERENTIAL PROBLEMS AND LEGAL OVERTONESAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1978
- PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE AFTER BRAIN DAMAGEThe Lancet, 1972
- [The depassed coma (preliminary memoir)].1959