Imitations of Libertarian Thought
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Social Philosophy and Policy
- Vol. 15 (2) , 412-436
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265052500002053
Abstract
Imitation is said to be the sincerest form of flattery. Socially, the proposition may well be true. But in the world of ideas it is false: to the extent that two incompatible traditions use the same words or symbols to articulate different visions of legal or social organization, imitation begets confusion, not enlightenment. The effects of that confusion, moreover, are not confined to the world of ideas, but spill over into the world of politics and public affairs. Words are more than tools of description: they work also as tools of persuasion and transformation. Let a term have a favorable connotation in one context, and its imitative use can mislead people into thinking that a major departure from established practice is merely the extension or updating of an old principle to deal with new circumstances.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- GuaranteesSocial Philosophy and Policy, 1997
- The Uneasy Case for the Priority of Secured Claims in BankruptcyThe Yale Law Journal, 1996
- Two Conceptions of Civil RightsSocial Philosophy and Policy, 1991
- Unconscionability: A Critical ReappraisalThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1975
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960
- Economic Duress: An Essay in PerspectiveMichigan Law Review, 1947
- Unconstitutional Conditions and Constitutional RightsColumbia Law Review, 1935
- Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive StatePolitical Science Quarterly, 1923