Impact of coronary artery stents on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a strategy of routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty
- 31 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 147 (5) , 815-822
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.025
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized Comparison of Elective Stent Implantation and Coronary Balloon Angioplasty Guided by Online Quantitative Angiography and Intracoronary DopplerCirculation, 2000
- Coronary Artery StentsJAMA, 2000
- A randomized comparison of elective high-pressure stenting with balloon angioplasty: Six-month angiographic and two-year clinical follow-upAmerican Heart Journal, 2000
- The French randomized optimal stenting trial: a prospective evaluation of provisional stenting guided by coronary velocity reserve and quantitative coronary angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Optimum percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Balloon optimization versus stent study (BOSS): provisional stenting and early recoil after balloon angioplastyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Outcomes at 1 year and economic implications of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in patients undergoing coronary stenting: results from a multicentre randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999
- A randomized trial of elective stenting after balloon recanalization of chronic total occlusionsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS)Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II)The Lancet, 1998