How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?
- 10 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 24 (6) , 424-429
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.892
Abstract
Objectives To describe women's preferences for prenatal testing outcomes and to explore their association with sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of 584 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse pregnant women aged 16 to 47 years recruited from 23 San Francisco Bay Area practices. We assessed preferences for 12 potential prenatal testing outcomes using the time trade-off metric for all outcomes and the standard gamble metric for two outcomes. Preferences were calculated on a scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Participants also completed a sociodemographic and attitude survey. Results Highest preference scores were assigned to outcomes resulting in the birth of a chromosomally normal infant (mean = 0.91–0.93; median = 0.99–1.00). Lower scores were obtained for outcomes involving pregnancy loss (mean = 0.69–0.87; median = 0.76–0.92), which were correlated with attitudes regarding miscarriage, pregnancy termination, and Down syndrome. The lowest scores were assigned to Down syndrome–affected births (mean = 0.67–0.69; median = 0.73–0.75), which also were correlated with attitudes toward Down syndrome. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between participants' preference scores and age. Conclusion Preferences for prenatal testing outcomes vary according to the pregnant women's underlying attitudes about pregnancy loss and Down syndrome, and not according to her age. Current age/risk-based guidelines should account for individual variation in patient preferences. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff?Prenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment of Prenatal Diagnosis: Chorionic Villi Sampling and AmniocentesisGenetic Testing, 2002
- Procedure-related miscarriages and down syndrome–affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferencesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter mostPrenatal Diagnosis, 1999
- Patient or Physician Preferences for Decision AnalysisMedical Decision Making, 1999
- Anxiety, knowledge and satisfaction in women receiving false positive results on routine prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trialJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993
- The psychological effects of false‐positive results in prenatal screening for fetal abnormality: A prospective studyPrenatal Diagnosis, 1992
- Anxiety in women with low maternal serum alpha‐fetoprotein screening resultsPrenatal Diagnosis, 1991
- Prenatal diagnosis and outcomes of five cases of mosaicism for an isochromosome of 20qPrenatal Diagnosis, 1991
- Patient Attitudes Toward Testing for Maternal Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein Values When Results Are False-Positive or True-NegativeSouthern Medical Journal, 1991