The Controversy Over High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant For Breast Cancer
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 20 (5) , 101-117
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.5.101
Abstract
In the 1990s more than 41,000 patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous bone marrow transplant (HDC-ABMT) for breast cancer, despite a paucity of clinical evidence of its efficacy. Most health plans reluctantly agreed to cover the treatment in response to intensive political lobbying and the threat of litigation. The results of five recent major randomized trials showed that HDC-ABMT offers no advantage over standard-dose treatment for breast cancer. Our experience with HDC-ABMT coverage cautions against allowing politics to overwhelm science in the area of evaluating experimental procedures, and against relying on the courts as a means of resolving disagreements about coverage of these interventions.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-Dose Chemotherapy plus Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Metastatic Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Conventional-Dose Chemotherapy Compared with High-Dose Chemotherapy plus Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Metastatic Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Randomized Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Blood Cell Autografts for High-Risk Primary Breast CarcinomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Chaos surrounds high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancerThe Lancet, 1999
- Last Chance Therapies and Managed Care: Pluralism, Fair Procedures, and LegitimacyHastings Center Report, 1998
- High-Dose Chemotherapy for Breast CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Variation in Approval by Insurance Companies of Coverage for Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Health Insurers' Assessment of Medical NecessityUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1992
- The Courts and Health Policy: Strengths and LimitationsHealth Affairs, 1992
- Judge-Made Law and Judge-Made Insurance: Honoring the Reasonable Expectations of the InsuredVirginia Law Review, 1981