Trends and influences on use of antidiabetic drugs in England, 1992-2003
- 14 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Vol. 14 (11) , 769-773
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1089
Abstract
Objective To describe trends in prescribing for glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus in England, 1993–2003, and to examine the effects of new clinical evidence or national guidance on these. Design Observational study of prescribing adjusted for extrapolated changes in epidemiology of insulin and non‐insulin treated diabetes. Setting Primary care in England, 1992–2003. Data sources Three monthly prescribing data from the Prescription Pricing Authority. Main outcome measures Defined daily doses/patient/quarter of oral hypoglycaemics and of insulin. Results There was an increase in the prevalence of both insulin treated (85%) and non‐insulin treated (80%) diabetes. There were increases in all drug use, which were largely explained by this: for example, sulphonylurea use increased by 101% in total but only 11% after correction for change in prevalence and population; insulin use increased by 140% in total, but 33% after correction. Neither guidances from the National Institute of Clinical Excellence nor new clinical evidence had any discernible effect on this. An exception was metformin use, which increased by 495% in total, and by 277% after correction. This increase occurred mainly from early 1998 and seemed to coincide with the publication of evidence of the specific benefits of metformin. Conclusions There has been a trend towards more aggressive treatment of diabetes. National guidance may have reinforced this but has not altered the trend. Specific evidence around metformin may have been very influential in increasing its use. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviewsBMJ, 2004
- Differences in treatment regimes, consultation frequency and referral patterns of diabetes mellitus in general practice in five European countriesFamily Practice, 2004
- The prevalence of known diabetes in eight European countries.European Journal of Public Health, 2004
- Do guidelines matter? A population-based study of diabetes drug use during 20 yearsScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2001
- A randomized double-blind trial of acarbose in type 2 diabetes shows improved glycemic control over 3 years (U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 44)Diabetes Care, 1999
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34)The Lancet, 1998
- UKPDS 28: A Randomized Trial of Efficacy of Early Addition of Metformin in Sulfonylurea-Treated Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 1998
- The Rising Global Burden of Diabetes and its Complications: Estimates and Projections to the Year 2010Diabetic Medicine, 1997
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993