Toward a Better Understanding of the Positive/Normative Distinction in Economics
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- essays
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Economics and Philosophy
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-17
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267100001681
Abstract
This essay argues in favor of retaining the positive/normative distinction in economics, in spite of developments in methodology and epistemology that have cast doubt on the possibility of a “value-free” economics. The central claim is that it is worthwhile to distinguish between positive economic analysis and normative judgments, even if economics is viewed as being permeated with ethical values. This argument is presented without trying either to demonstrate that there is (or is not) a profound epistemological difference between science and ethics or to show that positive science can (or cannot) afford us access to objective reality.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Essay on the Nature and Significance of the Normative Nature of EconomicsJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1988
- Value and Value‐Judgements in Economics: Rugina's ContributionInternational Journal of Social Economics, 1987
- Principles of EconomicsPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- The Necessary Normative Context of Positive EconomicsJournal of Economic Issues, 1981
- The Economist's Quandary: Ethical ValuesInternational Journal of Social Economics, 1981
- Economics as a Science and Its Relation to Policy: The Example of Free TradeJournal of Economic Issues, 1980
- WHY ECONOMISTS DISAGREEPublished by Elsevier ,1978