Agreement and disagreement between pathologists in histological diagnosis
Open Access
- 1 October 1975
- journal article
- objectivity in-histopathology
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Vol. 51 (600) , 685-689
- https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.51.600.685
Abstract
Summary: Studies on differences of observation and interpretation between pathologists in connection with histological diagnosis are rare. The present paper gives a general account of such a study, by members of the Cancer Research Campaign’s Bone Tumour Panel, of certain histological features of ‘malignant round-cell tumours’ of bone. Significant differences were found, not only between the different cases studied, but between the observations of the different pathologists, and between the repeated observations of individual pathologists.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of observer variation in population screening for cervical carcinomaJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1973
- The reliability of pathologists. A study of some cases of lymph node biopsies showing giant follicular hyperplasia or lymphoma.1971
- Consistency in the histological diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities of the cervix uteriJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1968
- AN EXAMINATION OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION IN MEDICINEThe Lancet, 1956
- Metastatic neuroblastoma in bone presenting the Ewing syndrome, with a discussion of "Ewing's sarcoma".1940
- Neuroblastoma Metastases in Bones, with a Criticism of Ewing's Endothelioma.1933